U.S. Senator Lamar Alexander is surely one of the more congenial figures in Tennessee politics or on the national scene, for that matter. As we have noted several times before, he has an uncanny ability to strike the right kind of bipartisan notes even while upholding the interests and precepts of the Republican Party (whose caucus chairman he is in the Senate).
Such was the case again Tuesday when the states senior senator and former governor addressed members of the Memphis Rotary Club on what else? the predicament of the United States of America, circa April 2009.
Alexander started with the good news. Commending Democratic governor Phil Bredesen for his governmental economies, the senator noted that, by virtue of the states constitutional requirement for a balanced budget, Tennesseans are burdened with almost no debt. The amount per capita is roughly $1000 and declining, Alexander observed leading the nation in that regard. Nationally, as he pointed out, the picture is far bleaker. The current amount of federal debt incurred per each man, woman, or child is $46,000 with expectations that it will rise to $76,000 in ten years.
With that amount of debt, we wouldnt even be eligible for membership in the European Union, Alexander quipped sardonically.
All that was preparation of sorts for the senators GOP talking points to come. But in the meantime he veered back to the cover of his ecumenical angel, defending the individualized appropriations called earmarks against criticism, mainly from the right. Many of the budgetary projects earmarked for Tennessee and elsewhere are valuable, he said, and, in any case, earmarks amount to no more than 1 percent of the federal budget.
The real problem, he said, lies with the entitlement programs of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Perhaps wisely, he avoided prescribing a remedy other than to suggest means-testing the hugely profligate Part D program tacked on to Medicare by a Bush-era Congress seemingly intent on emptying the Treasury for the benefit of Big Pharma. Constructively enough, Alexander also advocated establishing an impartial federal body to operate along the lines of the military base-closing commission of a generation ago.
From there, the senator went on to what he saw as the nations dangerous energy gap suggesting as a major remedy the re-activation of nuclear-energy facilities via a mini-Manhattan Project. He discounted solar energy and wind turbines in much the way he had minimized the issue of earmarks.
Next, Alexander proposed a federal crash program that would reduce the cost of college by moving to the concept of three-year degree programs and free community colleges.
Thats the innovative Alexander we like to hear, the same open-minded legislator who, back when the Bush administration was upping the military ante, came out for scaled-down commitments to Iraq.
Alas, in a final Q-and-A session with the Rotarians, the senator concluded by disapproving almost the entirety of President Obamas stimulus program while suggesting that the president should be focusing instead on fixing the banks.
On that bedrock of party-line GOP politics, the senator came to rest. On the whole, though, he had sounded notes appropriate to a loyal opposition, and in todays contentious political atmosphere, well take what we can get.